A warrant for construction work - how to quickly get it in 2021

Concept

During the Soviet era, a warrant was the only document that could confirm a person’s right to live in living space issued by the state.

By the way, even now large and young families can get an apartment from the state.

At the moment, the document has completely lost its force, since after the collapse of the Soviet Union it was replaced by other legal forms (tenancy agreement, home purchase agreement, etc.).

Despite the loss of relevance, it is difficult to carry out a number of important legal operations without a document. Thus, it will be much more difficult for a citizen to carry out privatization if he does not provide the appropriate warrant (see also - what other documents are needed for privatization).

A warrant is a certificate issued in the name of the person who disposes of the living space within the framework of certain laws of the USSR. In addition to responsibility, the document identifies citizens registered in this premises.

Order for Move-In to Residential Premises

- a house (residential premises) is in danger of collapse and is subject to eviction due to demolition, reconstruction or major repairs (from the moment the Government of Moscow or the Moscow Region, the prefects of the administrative districts of Moscow or the heads of municipalities of the Moscow Region make a decision on eviction);

Citizens move into residential premises that belong to them by right of ownership, regardless of the size of the living space. The move-in of other persons who are tenants (users) of this living space into the living space of the owners of residential premises is carried out in compliance with the requirements of the law on the standard of living space per person, except for the move-in of minor children, spouses and disabled parents of the tenant.

Document classification

There are four types of orders in total. Each of the classes is necessary to solve certain types of questions:

1. Official . It was given to a person who moved into a service apartment for the duration of work or a business trip. It had a limited validity period, which was stated in the document;
2. Temporary . The purpose was similar to the official one, but provided more extensive rights to use housing. Issued for a period of up to 30 days or until the end of a certain period (for example, the end of the school year).

The two apartment orders presented above are currently completely excluded from the document flow. They cannot be used for the purpose of privatization of housing or other legal actions.

The following two orders are found during certain operations, in particular during the privatization of living space:

1. Inspection - provided by the state to inspect potential housing. The document is current and is issued when the future owner of the apartment inspects the property;
2. Exchange - issued for persons wishing to exchange living space with the permission of the executive committee.

What it is

During the Soviet Union, housing orders were issued by local authorities - executive committees (executive committees). This document provided the right to move in and free use of an apartment, room, or other property. The validity period was not specified in the standard form.

In addition to the exact address, a standard document of this type contains the following information:

• Full name of the recipient along with passport details;
• identification data of family members;
• area, number of rooms;
• date of compilation, seal of the institution, signature of the responsible person.

Temporary order

It should be clarified what a temporary order for an apartment is. The content of such documents corresponded to the above list. However, the validity period of the permit was limited - no more than 30 calendar days. As a rule, it was issued for check-in into a dormitory (room in a communal apartment) for the period of study or business trip.

Almost the same functions as a temporary one were performed by a service order. A significant difference was the departmental ownership. Such real estate properties belonged to enterprises, scientific institutes, and other organizations. Housing was transferred only for the duration of the performance of relevant official duties.

The following type of document was used to inspect the premises before moving in. The standard validity period did not exceed five calendar days. The receipt of the inspection order is kept in the archives of the local administration.

For your information! Another form, an exchange order, was used to move to another property while simultaneously returning existing housing to the municipality.

Help form

The inspection document is a one-page certificate that is issued at the city hall. The warrant contains information about the citizen who is conducting the inspection, address, area of ​​housing and number of rooms.

Important: It is necessary to distinguish between an acceptance certificate and an inspection warrant. Signing the last document does not impose an obligation on the person to accept housing.

The document is valid for 5 days. During this time, the citizen must decide whether to accept the apartment provided or refuse, indicating the reasons. If the person agrees, the city administration begins the procedure for issuing the main occupancy order.

The form of the document for moving in is similar to the inspection document. The following information is provided here:

• Employer information;
• Number of people moving into the apartment;
• Information about each family member;
• Information about living space (number of rooms, area, etc.).

In this case, one part of the order is stored directly in the hands of the owners, and the other in the archives of the city hall.

Inspection warrant

A situation may arise that the order itself will not be able to be restored under any circumstances. Then the solution may be to conclude a social tenancy agreement. This exceptional case allows you to conclude an agreement without a warrant, however, an extract may be required stating that the order was lost and there are no more copies or records of it. In this case, the lease agreement concluded without an inspection warrant will serve as the basis for moving into this housing.

You may like => SDT What Is This Transcript Partnership

Then the process of drawing up, so to speak, the second part of the order, the move-in order, begins. It also has legal force. It must contain the following data: last name and initials of the tenant, the number of people who will move into this apartment, information about these citizens (last name and initials, date of birth), as well as data on the apartment (area, number of rooms).

A warrant is a certificate issued by government representatives of the Soviet Union who distributed living space among workers. It contains information about the building, its technical characteristics, owner and registered entities. Attention! In modern legislation, a similar document is a certificate of ownership, which is issued by Rosreestr.

Ideally, the request should be answered within 1 month after submitting the application in the established form. But it can take up to 3 months to check the attached papers. In general, it takes about six months to convert a state apartment into private ownership.

The need for a warrant in modern Russia

The need for a document depends on the type of housing:

• For privatized apartment, a certificate is not needed, since it is replaced by a certificate of ownership.
• For municipal , the need for a warrant is also questionable. For this type of property, a separate package of documents has been established: a social lease agreement, an agreement for free operation, etc.

Note: The only situation where a warrant may be required is the privatization of residential premises. In this case, the presence of a document speeds up the paperwork several times.

Moving citizens into residential premises

• passport of a citizen of the Russian Federation or identification document of a citizen;
• a document confirming the basis for moving in: a written statement of the person (persons) who provided the citizen with residential premises, a social tenancy agreement, a certificate of state registration of ownership of residential premises, a court decision recognizing the right to use residential premises or another document confirming such a right.

It is possible not to present a document that is the basis for moving into a residential premises if the information contained in it is at the disposal of state bodies or local governments. In this case, the registration authority independently requests the relevant document (information contained in it), an extract from the relevant register, other information in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation from state bodies, local governments and registers the citizen at the place of residence no later than eight working days from the day of his submission of an application for registration at the place of residence and an identity document.

Registration of an order

The updated Housing Code of 2005 officially replaced warrants with contracts, which lawyers divide into 3 types:

• Commercial agreement (purchase and sale);
• Social contract;
• Agreement on free use of living space.

In the USSR, when all residential premises were owned by departments, social rental agreements were concluded by organizations providing their workers with housing, and not by the citizens themselves. The order was issued by the executive committee and was an official confirmation of the fact of moving into the housing. Currently, all non-privatized apartments are located in municipalities, which is why there is no need for two identical documents.

It is impossible to obtain a warrant after 2005 in modern Russia, however, if the certificate is issued before the specified date, the document remains legally valid, so it will not be superfluous to store it.

Note: If there is such a certificate for housing, the owner must have another document in his hands - a social rent agreement. It is on its basis that the owner’s rights to the apartment can be confirmed.

Situations when a warrant is needed

Now, for the period of 2021, the legal nature of the order is completely lost. But sometimes it is still necessary.

Some legal transactions cannot be carried out without a warrant:

1. In the case when a citizen enters into a social lease agreement. And this is impossible without presenting an old housing warrant. It is a kind of basis for issuing a new document.
2. If a housing privatization operation is carried out. A new agreement is sometimes not concluded and not preserved by citizens. As a result, the order remains the only document confirming the residents’ right to living space.

But it should be taken into account that in the regions of the Russian Federation the procedure for privatization of housing is slightly modified: in some regions they may ask for an old order, and a copy must be made, but in others it will be possible to privatize only if there is a new social rent agreement.

Restoring a lost certificate

Despite the fact that orders are everywhere being replaced by various contracts, their loss significantly slows down the procedure for privatization of living space, which is why some citizens need to restore the document.

Note: It is highly recommended that you begin recovering a document immediately after it is lost. This process is not difficult, however, it requires some time for bureaucratic operations.

The procedure for restoring a lost document consists of 3 stages:

1. Visit to the repair and maintenance department . You must request a special coupon from the institution. If he is absent from the authority, then the manager is obliged to issue a certificate that officially confirms the fact of the loss;
2. Contacting the district administration at the location of the residential area. At the authority, you need to fill out an application, which sets out a written request to begin concluding an agreement for renting premises for housing. When filling out a tenancy agreement, you should engage a housing lawyer. If the city administration decides to refuse a person, he has the right to appeal to the courts;
3. The final authority will be the real estate department of the area where the housing is located. If this institution could not help, then the only option is a one-stop service, whose task is to monitor the immediate recovery of the document.

In addition to the above method, you can prove ownership of an apartment by accessing the archives located in the local administration. It contains not only information about the owner of the apartment, but also copies of the certificate and social tenancy agreement. When filling out an application, the local administration is obliged to provide the documents requested by the person.

Note: The administration does not have the right to issue a duplicate of the order, since it is not stated in the regulations of the Russian Federation. The citizen receives a document indicating a certificate on the basis of which he has the right to live in the living space.

Regarding the restoration of lost documents in court. All information about citizens registered in an apartment is stored in house registers, FMS authorities, etc., so returning the data through the court will not be difficult.

How to restore a warrant for an apartment

You can restore this document if it is lost in two ways. In the first case, you first need to contact your remote control office and ask for a copy of the tear-off coupon of the order. If it is not in the control system, then you need to request a certificate of its absence. Then you need to contact the housing department of the administration with these documents.

It is unlikely that you will be able to obtain a copy. But an alternative and, unlike it, legally binding social rent agreement will be issued. If the administration refuses, then you should go to court with a demand to restore the order and, on its basis, obtain a rental agreement. To do this, you will have to prepare a statement of claim and present a written refusal to the administration.

In addition to this, you must provide the court with copies of passports of all residents, certificates of registration at this place of residence, and copies of financial documents. indicating utility payments. It will be very good if there are people. able to testify that the family has moved in and is living in the apartment legally. The court will make a positive decision, but you will have to be content with the social tenancy agreement, since there is no other document confirming the right to live in municipal housing.

You can try to restore the order through the “single window” of the MFC.

Warrant and privatization

The most common reason why a person needs a warrant is privatization. In this case, all documents for housing are submitted to the local administration, and in return an agreement is concluded between the person and the authorities on the transfer of ownership of the apartment. During this operation, documents such as a warrant and a social tenancy agreement completely lose their legal purpose.

Despite the fact that the administration requires the delivery of the warrant, its loss does not prevent the person from privatizing the apartment. The owner just needs to write a statement about the loss, after which local authorities will independently find the information in the archives.

But in the event of loss of a social tenancy agreement, it is subject to mandatory restoration, since it is a mandatory document confirming the legal rights of a citizen to privatize residential premises.

Note: Often officials play it safe and refuse a citizen an agreement without a warrant. The dispute can be resolved in two ways - in court or by re-issuing the document.

The basis for occupying residential premises under a social tenancy agreement is a warrant for residential premises, for occupying residential premises under a commercial tenancy - a lease (commercial tenancy), for the owner - a document certifying ownership (Article 21 of the Law on the Fundamentals of Housing Policy). Let's consider the issue of a warrant as a basis for occupying residential premises. A warrant for residential premises is issued as a legal basis for moving into residential premises under a rental agreement (Article 13 of the Law on the Fundamentals of Housing Policy). According to Art. 672 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in the state and municipal housing stock, residential premises are provided to citizens under a social tenancy agreement for residential premises. A social tenancy agreement for residential premises is concluded on the basis, on the terms and in the manner provided for by housing legislation. Thus, in relation to housing relations in the field of social tenancy, the order for residential premises and the social tenancy agreement for residential premises are in close, inextricable unity and interaction. The procedure for issuing a warrant is determined in the Housing Code of the RSFSR (Article 47). Based on the decision to provide residential premises in a building of the state, municipal or public housing stock, the relevant local administration body issues a warrant to the citizen, which is the only basis for moving into the provided residential premises. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation “On the procedure for providing residential space under the jurisdiction of the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation” No. 108 of February 14, 1997 allowed the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation to issue its orders for the occupancy of residential premises subordinate to this department. By its legal nature, a warrant for residential premises is a special administrative-legal document that contains a decree, an order from a housing maintenance organization to provide the citizen in whose name the warrant is issued and members of his family for the use of residential premises specified in the warrant. The recognition of the warrant as the basis for moving into the provided residential premises was due to the fact that previously there were often cases of provision of residential premises on the basis of other documents of various kinds (obligations under an employment agreement, decisions of trade union committees, resolutions of the head of an enterprise (institution and organization, etc.) etc.), which often led to cases of illegal disposal of housing, to numerous disputes over the correct distribution and provision of residential premises. A warrant is the basis for moving into a residential premises. The use of this premises is carried out in accordance with the lease agreement and the rules for the use of residential premises ( Article 50 of the Housing Code of the RSFSR). However, in light of the provisions of Article 672 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation that now not only the use, but also the provision of residential premises to citizens must be carried out under a social tenancy agreement, accordingly, adjustments must be made to the procedure for providing housing and concluding a rental agreement, which must be concluded before a citizen moves into a residential premises. Nowadays, a rental agreement for residential premises is usually concluded much later after the citizen has moved into the residential premises, and often is not concluded at all. It follows from the text of Article 672 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation that the provision of residential premises must be made on the basis of a rental agreement for residential premises. The legislation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation is also developing in this direction. Thus, in the Law “Fundamentals of Housing Policy in Moscow” adopted by the Moscow City Duma in 1998, there is no indication of a warrant as a document granting the right to move into residential premises. In Art. 13 of the Law states: “The basis for moving citizens into residential premises is a social tenancy agreement,” and instead of a warrant, an extract from the decision of the local administration body is issued as such a document, on the basis of which a social or commercial tenancy agreement is concluded. In this regard, it should be recognized that the norm of Article 47 of the RSFSR Housing Code came into conflict with the Constitution of the Russian Federation. As correctly stated in the literature, “...with the fragmentation of state property into federal and property of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, as well as the allocation of municipal property, maintaining a single order for the occupancy of vacant residential premises, regardless of the form of ownership of residential premises, will be an illegal administrative act of interference in the right to dispose of the property of another owner, violation of the inviolability of property and the principle of civil law establishing non-interference in the affairs of other citizens.” In the rental agreement for residential premises, in strict accordance with the decision on the provision of residential premises and the order, in addition to indicating the participants in the housing relationship (landlord, tenant and members of his family), the subject (object) of the rental agreement, the rights and obligations of the parties, other terms of the agreement are established hiring The person who has received the warrant must, within the prescribed period, hand it over to the appropriate housing maintenance organization to conclude a social tenancy agreement for residential premises and only after that move into the provided residential premises. Housing authorities in charge of issuing warrants may suspend their issuance in cases where citizens rent out the living space they are vacating in a faulty condition; when the actual composition of the family does not correspond to that specified in the decision of the local administration on the provision of residential premises; when circumstances are revealed that were previously unknown and could influence the decision on the provision of premises to another person. The authority in charge of issuing warrants informs the local administration about the suspension of the issuance of the warrant in these cases. The citizen in whose name the warrant is issued, upon receipt of it, must provide the consent of all adult family members to move into the provided residential premises, as well as a written obligation to hand over to the landlord no later than a month the vacated living space in good technical condition upon departure of all residents. Article 48 of the RSFSR Housing Code establishes the grounds and procedure for invalidating a warrant for residential premises. An order may be declared invalid in court in cases where citizens provide false information about the need for improved housing conditions, violation of the rights of other citizens or organizations to the residential premises specified in the order, unlawful actions of officials when deciding on the provision of residential premises, as well as in other cases of violation of the procedure and conditions for the provision of residential premises. The Housing Code of the RSFSR (Article 100) established the consequences of invalidating the order. If the persons who received the warrant act unlawfully, they are subject to eviction without the provision of other residential premises. If the citizens specified in the order previously used residential premises in a state or public housing fund, they must be provided with the residential premises that they occupied or other residential premises. If the order is declared invalid for other reasons, the citizens specified in the order are subject to eviction with the provision of another residential premises or premises that they previously occupied. According to the law (Part 2, Article 48 of the RSFSR Housing Code), a requirement to invalidate an order can be filed within three years from the date of its issuance.

Obtaining two or more certificates for an apartment

Due to the lack of legal force in orders for an apartment, there is no need to obtain such documents. However, if a person has several close relatives, between whom the living space needs to be divided, the person may receive several orders.

To do this, it is necessary to change the status of the apartment to communal, dividing bills, area, etc. between family members. The procedure is carried out in court and requires a lot of time.

In the case of a privatized apartment, the living space must be divided into several shares, the number of which corresponds to the number of future owners. After this, each citizen registers the area allocated for him with all the accompanying documents (including the warrant).

Are they currently issuing a housing warrant?

Since 2005, the new Housing Code of the Russian Federation has officially eliminated the obligation to obtain a warrant for an apartment for occupancy. Nowadays, it is necessary to conclude written agreements and contracts with a detailed description of the rights and obligations of the parties. The exception is “inspection” and “exchange” documents, which are drawn up in any form.

When moving into municipal housing on social rent

Permission for the initial inspection is issued by the municipality. Its preparation is permissible in the form of a written order. If there are no objections, a standard social tenancy agreement (DSN) for a non-privatized apartment is drawn up and signed. No additional confirmation is required for check-in.

If you have an old order, no other confirmation will be required to issue a DSN at the local administration. This document is enough to get an apartment for free use without going through the privatization procedure. In addition they provide:

• civil passports of adult family members;
• birth certificates of children under 14 years of age;
• Marriage certificate.

When moving into a cooperative apartment

If a housing order was used when purchasing a cooperative apartment, the effectiveness of this document should be correctly assessed. He does not confirm the absence of claims against the developer. It cannot be used as a certificate of payment of a share contribution.

The transfer of ownership in this case is conditioned by the complete completion of settlements. After the house is occupied, the cooperatives are re-registered as an HOA. The partnership office issues certificates and ensures the safety of archival documents.

Characteristics of a private home as personal property for obtaining a warrant

A private residential building is nothing more than a separate entity to which the owner has certain housing rights. The

The point also applies to individual rooms, as well as apartments. However, it is worth paying attention to certain distinctive features.

For example, the right to free privatization of housing is granted exclusively once in a lifetime, and the house itself is provided by the state as a separate object of housing law.

It is important to know that privatization of housing means the transfer to a legal entity or individual citizen of the country of residential premises previously owned by the state.

A dwelling must meet certain standards that will legally meet suitable living conditions for acceptable occupancy and viability. Namely:

• technical characteristics;
• engineering standards;
• sanitary requirements;
• acceptable hygiene factors;
• full suitability for living and living.

To draw up an agreement on the privatization of an entire house or part of it, it is necessary that the applicant himself has the rights to its further use.

A citizen may be granted this right if he has been assigned an agreement on the transfer of an order or a social tenancy agreement. These conditions had to be met no later than 2005, inclusive.

Question answer

Is a warrant a document of title? – Yes, it is, but only in the absence of other title documents. In case of social hiring, such a document is an agreement with the municipality.

Where is the apartment warrant kept? – The order is kept by the representative of the house management in case of social renting or by the commandant of the hostel when living in official housing.

How many warrants can there be for an apartment? – The number of warrants issued for one living space depends on the number of living families and cannot exceed the number of rooms in the apartment. One person can only have one residential warrant.

An order is a document indicating the existence of the right to reside in official or municipal housing and determining the period of residence and the number of square meters occupied. If title documents are lost, they can be restored using a warrant.

Order to move into residential premises

At the same time, it will not be possible to challenge the refusal of the tenant’s family members to move in a new tenant. The Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated July 2, 2009 No. 14 established that the reasons why family members of the tenant refuse to give consent to move other persons into the residential premises have no legal significance (clause 26).

The warrant is directly related to the person to whom it is issued and cannot be transferred to others, valid for 30 days. The warrant is served on the citizen in whose name it was issued, or on his behalf to another person. Upon moving in, a citizen submits a warrant to the housing maintenance organization, and in its absence, to the relevant enterprise, institution, organization, while simultaneously receiving passports of all family members with a mark of eviction from the previous place of residence. Family members who are included in the order are moved into the provided residential premises.

Obtaining housing at your own disposal under the terms of a social tenancy agreement

In order for a citizen of the country and his family to receive housing under the terms of a social tenancy agreement, it is important to have two mandatory conditions:

1. a citizen or his entire family should not have their own living space at their disposal;
2. the size of living space, calculated in , per person should not be less than the housing standards.

In addition, the question often arises about who has the right to participate in the privatization procedure. The applicant, his relatives, family members and even children under the age of majority have the right to obtain free privatization of a residential building. All of them must be registered in this house.

The first thing the whole privatization process begins with is obtaining consent from all family members registered in a given house. It is important to discuss this issue before the transaction begins. After this, everyone becomes a share owner and receives equal rights and shares. In addition, the benefit of timely actions lies in the fact that one of the family members may not express their desire to participate in the privatization process. In this case, it is important to draw up and sign a statement of refusal to participate in the privatization process. This document will come into force after it receives legal basis. To do this, the paper must be certified by a notary office. After this, this document is submitted with the rest of the documentation package for further consideration. Any family member has the right to refuse, with the exception of children under the age of majority. However, it is worth noting the fact that they are assigned the right to receive ownership of housing or a certain part of it, which will be taken care of by government agencies once they reach the age of majority.

Warrant for residential premises and its legal significance

In the Civil Code, the terms “lease” and “lease” are identical, so a logical question arises: are a lease agreement in the context of the Housing Code and a civil lease agreement identical? According to Art. 61 of the Housing Code, the use of residential premises in houses of state and public housing stock is carried out in accordance with the rental agreement for residential premises. A rental agreement is an agreement whose purpose is to meet the housing needs of citizens, that is, it is a “non-commercial agreement.” At the same time, a lease agreement is a paid agreement that can be carried out with the aim of making a profit for the lessor.

An order is a document of title of an individual nature, which is issued by the executive body of the local council, competent to make decisions on the provision of living space, and is the basis for citizens to move into the provided residential premises in the houses of the state or public housing stock or housing-construction cooperative fund. The order gives rise to two types of legal relations: administrative and legal relations between the executive body of the council and the housing maintenance organization, civil legal relations between the citizen and the specified housing maintenance organization. Based solely on the decision itself, a citizen does not have the right to demand the implementation of any actions to provide him with the premises specified in the decision.

Difficult situations when receiving a warrant

Problems in obtaining, extending or closing construction work orders may be associated with the following circumstances:

• absence of permits for construction or other types of work, or their expiration (for example, if the main permit has expired, work cannot be performed under the warrant);
• non-compliance of the work plan with project documentation and regulations;
• exceeding the permitted types and volumes of work;
• violations of safety requirements when installing fences, scaffolding, and placing special equipment;
• impossibility of carrying out work in connection with city public events;
• lack of rights to the site or facility where work is to be carried out.

Naturally, the issuance of a warrant will be refused if an incomplete set of documentation is provided, or if it contradicts the rules and regulations. ]Smart Way[/anchor] specialists will help you meet all these requirements if you order a service for obtaining warrants and other necessary documents.

Advantages of privatization

After the final stage of the privatization process is completed, the citizen will receive a residential building at his disposal. If it is bought by several citizens, and all of them have registration in it, then the house has the status of being purchased as shared ownership.

One of the relatives may refuse to participate in privatization in order to assign a share to the child. In this case, the house is registered in the name of one person.

Everyone who has received legal grounds to dispose of their new property can make further decisions on what to do with their part. The following options exist:

• sale of a house or part to which this person has rights;
• renting out a house or part of it;
• drawing up a will to transfer your share to inheritance.

If one of the family members who has rights to a part of the house wants to sell it, then the other family members who share in the rights of owners have the primary right to buy out this part. Before a party decides to sell its part, it undertakes to take care of drawing up an offer on its part to purchase part of the home, addressed to other family members who have ownership rights to this house. The cost must be within acceptable limits.

For their part, other family members who have rights to the house are required to provide their response in writing about what they intend to do. If they agree with the sale, then they should fill out a purchase and sale agreement for this part of the residential building. After this, re-registration should be carried out and then part of the house passes into the personal use of another relative who has property rights.

If family members refuse this proposal, then the refusal should be drawn up and signed in writing and this document must be certified by a notary so that it comes into force and receives a legal basis.

What are the differences between the privatization of a house and a plot of land? Both one and the other procedure serves as the basis for achieving the same goal, namely, to provide the owner with legal rights to own property. However, it is worth paying attention to the differences between them. For example, issues of privatization are resolved on the basis of different laws. One involves the housing stock, and the other involves the rights of citizens of the country to individual plots of real estate.

In addition, differences can be observed in the package of necessary documentation itself, in the order of registration and in the bodies themselves conducting this type of procedure. Unfortunately, cases with residential buildings and plots of land cause a lot of controversy and give rise to numerous questions due to the lack of specifics.